Pentamix: Does it Save Money and Chair Time?

Anon asks:

PentamixI work with two other dentists and we are thinking about buying a Pentamix set-up. We plan on putting the Pentamix on a cart and wheeling it from operatory to operatory as needed. We have been using the cartridges for twenty years and they work fine but we think we can cut down on chair time and waste by using the Pentamix system.

It seems pretty straightforward. Can somebody with experience with this system offer advice? Have you found that in the long term it saves money and chair time?

Editors Note:

According to 3M, the goal of the Pentamix system is: “to help you capture an accurate, problem-free impression the first time … every time. With the touch of a button, Pentamix Automatic Mixing Unit mixes and dispenses a completely homogeneous mix. And it’s free of voids that can interfere with the accuracy of the impression and the final fit of the prosthesis. Trying to manually squeeze heavy body impression material out of a cartridge dispenser can put added strain on assistants. The Pentamix™ 2 Automatic Mixing Unit puts an end to staff complaints.”

Print this page Print This Post

Filed Under Restorative, 3i Dental Implants, Impression Materials 

Comments

4 Responses to “Pentamix: Does it Save Money and Chair Time?”

  1. Alejandro Berg on October 3rd, 2007 8:32 pm

    Actually I use the kettenbach version, it does not save time, but you get 0 bubbles consistently and that saves time…
    The one I use does save money because the machine costs less than half of the 3m version and the cartridges too (the silicone is really good , much better than the 3m) it also saves money because i dont have too re do impresions(almost never).
    Hope this helped.
    alex

  2. jack binder on October 5th, 2007 8:18 am

    We have used the 3-M Penta machine and Garant cartridges for decades. We use several different 3-M materials depending on the situation. It saves time, saves material, makes getting perfect impressions routine, and saves aggravation. Assistants love the quick cleanup. All the positives I’m sure, means it saves money also, because time and accuracy is money. The only materials we mix by hand are temporary cements and alginates.

  3. Ron Antoine, DDS on October 8th, 2007 9:14 am

    We used the tubes for years, but the Pentix machine actually has less wasted material.
    Saves time + material.

  4. Marv on October 8th, 2007 2:43 pm

    Been using the penta machine since its intro probably over 10 yrs. I dont use any pvs materials. Have used impregum medium body polyether for everything. No distortion. No remakes. No headaches.No complaints from the staff. Patients dont like the taste. I got most of my machines free or at least inexpensively through new product introductions. In my office it has been a great benefit.

Got something to say?